Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie streaming web sites, where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here most of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He is a laborer and only works every now royal vegas online casino 1000 free spins and then.’ Apparently, this might be one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely peaceful man. He just wandered in extremely calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of these two tales is just a bit more terrifying, since the axe was wielded perhaps not during the slots, but at a person in the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant with all the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the regional public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is related to the concept that neighboring communities will be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of applicants who have suggested that most of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that would be based in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it could have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t arrive at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power over the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey unearthed that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with only two coming away against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by their state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading activities betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the local roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there is certainly concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and pay day loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back in the corner associated with the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with all the guidelines and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is no further a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a completely innocent donation or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his neighborhood constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he truly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this present year his workplace ended up being accused of editing his Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.